my favorite thing 4e let you do was dual wield bows, personally

fuckyeahdnd:

leafgirlinabox:

1980sspaceman:

fuckyeahdnd:

bowtochris:

fuckyeahdnd:

My favorite is the triple vampire but I’d love to hear how you get to dual wield bows because that shit rules

Triple vampire?

I don’t remember the exact details BUT Vampire was a class in Heroes of Shadow. The reason they made it into a class was because the powers of a vampire were easier to represent as stuff you gained as you leveled up so you wouldn’t end up starting as a level 1 Vampire Fighter or something in a group of higher level characters just to make up for your more powerful abilities.

There was also a race who were kinda sorta depicted as humans with a connection to vampires to the point where they actually gained some vampiric stuff. So that’s your double vampire.

But even before this stuff there was a series of feats that let you be a Dhampir or a half-vampire and gain some vampiric powers. So triple vampire.

If you wanted to get really weird with it you could have your triple vampire die and be brought back as a revenant in which case you’d be a double undead triple vampire.

It rules.

Dual Wield bows (or full blades, or any two handed weapons) requires you to hybridize fighter/ranger. Rangers can wield one handed weapons in their off hand with one class feature. Fighters have an Epic Destiny that lets you wield two handed weapons in one hand.

Ergo, double bows.

Are… are you saying I could be a double undead triple vampire with double bows

Like I’m not sure because the double undead triple vampire operates on being Vampire class and the Double Bows thing relies on being a Fighter/Ranger hybrid but if you’re okay with just being an undead Double Vampire you could play a Fighter/Ranger with the vampire race and dhampir feats and then become a revenant and still have double bows which still rules

Leave a comment